September 2014
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
z
Paul's Thing is a
Gang of Six™ Production

Paul’s E-Reading

Paul’s Tree-Reading

Paul’s Book Reviews

Goodreads-logo-e1335894465198

Credit


Shit hot header photos by Paul, w/assistance from "The Thing?"

Copyright

Copyright 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 by Paul Woodford. All rights reserved.

Banned Book News Roundup & Book Review

“Teachers won’t be able to model those skills if our schools and courts continue to muzzle them. But the same democratic imperative also demands that teachers responsibly restrict what they say, just as other professionals do.”

That’s from a New York Times op-ed by Jonathan Zimmerman.  Does it sound like he’s saying teachers need to censor themselves in order not to be censored?  Sure sounds like it to me.  I say it’s spinach, and I say to hell with it.

Not much else going on in banned book news this week.  Well, there’s this, a Los Angeles ABC station’s report titled “ACLU wants porn to be allowed for South Carolina inmates.”  I’m always suspicious when I see ACLU-baiting headlines like that, because the real story is almost always exactly the opposite.  Apparently libertarian blogger Radley Balko felt the same way.  His report … based on research, not ideological assumptions … is titled “The ACLU is not suing to put porn in jails.”

——————–

I’m reading banned books again and will be adding reviews to my banned book news roundup posts.  Here’s the banned book de jour:

Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America, by Barbara Ehrenreich

This book was recently challenged by parents in Bedford, New Hampshire, who wanted it taken off a high school finance class reading list. The parents’ stated objection was to a sentence describing Jesus Christ as a wine-guzzling socialist vagrant, but I suspect their real objection was to the book’s political message … certainly that was the case with the many right-wing bloggers who took up the parents’ cause and cheered when the school board buckled and removed the book from the reading list. I decided to read Nickel and Dimed to see what the fuss was about.

Barbara Ehrenreich, hardly the Marxist described by her critics, goes undercover and tries to make ends meet by working a succession of low-wage jobs.  Her experience underscores the near impossibility getting ahead, or even keeping one’s head above water, when you’re making minimum wage.

What’s interesting is that the book was written after the first wave of welfare-to-work initiatives imposed in several states during the Clinton administration. Things are undoubtedly much worse now. Then, there were still federal and state programs to help the working poor, if you knew where to look. Now there is almost nothing.

I must say, it’s a shocking book, and a depressing one. Workers, often single mothers, cannot live on one minimum wage job. They have to work two and even three, and still cannot afford anything but the basics: a roof, food … and often not even that.  Cheap apartments or trailers are increasingly impossible to find, and the trend is for several low-wage workers to live together in weekly-rate motel rooms. Miss a day or two of work and you’re out of a job. Get sick, ditto. Your junker breaks down? Sorry, Charlie, and where did you get the idea trash like you was entitled to a car in the first place?

After reading Nickel and Dimed, it occurred to me that if I were to re-read Les Misérables, I’d probably find that not much has changed since Jean Valjean’s day.

Critics and political commentators have attempted to belittle Barbara Ehrenreich for undertaking her experiment, trying to make ends meet with a succession of waitressing, housecleaning, and low-end retail jobs paying, at most, $7 an hour, when all along she had an out: she could have returned to her comfortable life at any time, and she could (and did) move on to different parts of the country when she got bored and discouraged with any particular location and job. They characterize her as a rich dilettante, playing at being poor in order to sell books.

But the book needed to be written, and in my opinion high school kids (ye gods, especially high school kids) need to read it. Could a real single mom, slaving away at two or three part-time benefitless minimum wage jobs, have given voice to the plight of minimum wage workers in America today? I thank Barbara for taking on the project. It can’t have been fun.

© 2011, Paul Woodford. All rights reserved.

Share

1 comment to Banned Book News Roundup & Book Review

  • The truth is, American capitalism thrives on high unemployment, because unemployment puts pressure on job-seekers to accept jobs with lower pay. Meanwhile, the capitalist running dogs are out-sourcing more highly-skilled jobs to India (and several other countries). And the reason so many people have to take low-wage jobs is that they don’t have the skills or the education to fill higher-paying jobs. In the meantime, people in India, many of whom are highly educated, hard-working, and ambitious get highly-skilled jobs from American companies who don’t want to page higher wages in America. And why are all these educated, highly-skilled Indians taking jobs that pay less than they would in America? Because both China and India have over-population problems so enormous that they represent a vast pool of potential labor fighting for available jobs. This is one of the most fundamental rules of economics. It is so tightly inter-woven with over-population, but here and abroad, that the two cannot be unentangled.

    The relationship between overpopulation, unemployment, and low education levels always has and always will work in favor of the capitalists. Only part of the problem is that of outsourcing. Another part is the increasing number of job-seekers with inadequate education. A third part is the fact that Americans simply want too many things for too-little money. I think the bulk of the remaining problem is over-population here at home. Despite what the Christian right believes, we have to find a way to reduce the number of job-seekers for some time to come. I think the best way is to make clear to families and young women the high cost of having children and giving them a reasonable chance for future employability. And, of course, we have to deal with the number of children born to teenagers.

    But what we most need to do is to focus on education in a massive way. If we can increase the general level of education across all levels of society, then we have a chance to compete with foreign countries for highly-skilled jobs. If we don’t bother, then more and more Americans will be doomed to being “nickled and dimed” to death.

Leave a Reply