My, what won’t they think of next?<\/p>\n
Your past life diagnosis:
\nI don’t know how you feel about it, but you were female in your last earthly incarnation. You were born somewhere in the territory of modern Oceania around the year 1750. Your profession was that of a sailor or shoemaker.<\/p>\nYour brief psychological profile in your past life:
\nSuch people are always involved with all new. You have always loved changes, especially in art, music, cooking.<\/p>\nThe lesson that your last past life brought to your present incarnation:
\nYour lesson is to learn discretion and moderation and then to teach others to do the same. Your life will be happier if you help those who lack reasoning.<\/p>\nDo you remember now?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Espousing moderation and reason?\u00a0 That’s me, all right.\u00a0 I don’t remember being female, but maybe it’s not that different from being male, and that’s why it doesn’t stand out to me.\u00a0 But being a female sailor or shoemaker in the second half of the 18th Century?\u00a0 That certainly would have\u00a0constituted\u00a0being involved with\u00a0all new!<\/p>\n
Unless . . . unless I was\u00a0Polynesian!\u00a0 Sure,\u00a0Polynesians sailed all over the Pacific, men and women alike, and probably the women did most of the sailoring.\u00a0 Ah, but what about those shoes?\u00a0 Did the Polynesians\u00a0do<\/em> shoes?\u00a0 So if I were a female Polynesian shoemaker, there I am again, involved with\u00a0all new!<\/p>\n
New?\u00a0 All new?\u00a0 Hey, I’m your girl!<\/p>\n
I don’t know . . . maybe your past life will make more sense than mine (unless you too were born on\u00a0the 31st of October, 1946).\u00a0 Why not click here<\/a> and find out?<\/p>\n