{"id":2290,"date":"2009-06-17T14:07:21","date_gmt":"2009-06-17T21:07:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/?p=2290"},"modified":"2009-06-17T16:49:22","modified_gmt":"2009-06-17T23:49:22","slug":"balanced-news-you-can-count-on","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/?p=2290","title":{"rendered":"Balanced News You Can Count On . . ."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>. . . to serve the corporate masters.\u00a0 Warning: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.npr.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">NPR<\/a> kvetching ahead.<\/p>\n<p>I thought <a href=\"http:\/\/wamu.org\/programs\/dr\/\" target=\"_blank\">Diane Rehm&#8217;s show<\/a> started off well this morning: she interviewed presidential science advisor Dr. John Holdren about the latest <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/cwire\/2009\/06\/17\/17climatewire-us-study-projects-how-unequivocal-warming-wi-29186.html\" target=\"_blank\">White House report on climate change<\/a>.\u00a0 And here&#8217;s the thing: she had him on by himself, not up against a panel of climate change deniers.\u00a0 Good, I thought, we&#8217;re going to have a serious discussion about climate change, not the usual he said\/she said &#8220;fair &amp; balanced&#8221; crap NPR&#8217;s been pushing lately.\u00a0 Let&#8217;s for once hear what a responsible spokesman for the scientific community has to say about climate change.\u00a0 Go, NPR!\u00a0 Go, Diane Rehm!<\/p>\n<p>And then, ten minutes into the interview, Diane announced a short break, and it became apparent that Dr. Holdren had been on the phone and not in the studio.\u00a0 After the break, sure as hell, Diane basically turned the show over to a denialist hack from the Wall Street Journal who launched into the familiar GOP talking-points litany: there&#8217;s nothing to these hysterical rumors; how can there be global warming when it froze last night in Buffalo; scientists disagree; all&#8217;s well with the world; just keep moving folks there&#8217;s nothing to see here . . . and I turned the radio off in disgust.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_2291\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2291\" style=\"width: 425px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/images.salon.com\/comics\/tomo\/2007\/02\/26\/tomo\/story.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2291\" title=\"story\" src=\"http:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/story.jpg\" alt=\"Click to enlarge\" width=\"425\" height=\"395\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-2291\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Click to enlarge<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the deal: when the media give climate change denialists equal time, it creates in listeners (and is designed to create) the illusion that climate change is a 50\/50 proposition: one person warns of climate change, another person says there&#8217;s no such thing.\u00a0 Well, it&#8217;s not a 50\/50 proposition; it&#8217;s more like 95\/5: climate change, and mankind&#8217;s contribution to it through greenhouse gas emissions, is the scientific consensus . . . observable, well-studied, and documented.\u00a0 The denialists, whether they come from the religious or corporate community,\u00a0 are a small minority with no data to back up their claims . . . and yet they always get equal time.\u00a0 This isn&#8217;t &#8220;balance.&#8221;\u00a0 This isn&#8217;t &#8220;fair.&#8221;\u00a0 It&#8217;s propaganda.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not just Diane Rehm, of course, it&#8217;s all of NPR and major media in general.\u00a0 No matter how removed from reality whacko minority beliefs are, those beliefs are presented as legitimate points of view by the media.\u00a0 Lately I&#8217;m seeing increasing reportage on the &#8220;controversy&#8221; over President Obama&#8217;s birth certificate, without any accompanying mention that there is no controversy: Obama <a href=\"http:\/\/www.snopes.com\/politics\/obama\/birthcertificate.asp\" target=\"_blank\">produced the birth certificate<\/a> prior to the 2008 election, the first presidential candidate ever to be asked to do so.\u00a0 Yes, there are crazies who do not, will not, accept the fact that Obama is a US citizen.\u00a0 Why are the media giving these racist fuckwads air time?\u00a0 Even reporting on it implies . . . and creates in uninformed listeners and viewers . . . doubt.  I ask again, quite seriously: why are the media giving these racist fuckwads air time?<\/p>\n<p>Okay, Nice Polite Republicans, if you&#8217;re really committed to this &#8220;Shape of Earth: Views Differ&#8221; style of reporting, how come advocates of single-payer health care don&#8217;t get equal time?\u00a0 How come advocates of immediate military withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan don&#8217;t get equal time?\u00a0 How come advocates of a North American union don&#8217;t get equal time?<\/p>\n<p>Oh, don&#8217;t worry, I know I&#8217;m wasting my breath here . . . the corporate shills at NPR will always come down on the side of their masters.\u00a0 Diane Rehm, I&#8217;ve given up on you.\u00a0 You <a href=\"http:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/?p=269\" target=\"_self\">used to fight it<\/a>, a little . . . now you just hand your mic over to the propagandists.\u00a0 Do you invite these hacks onto your show yourself, or are you just doing what you&#8217;re told to do?<\/p>\n<p>Thank God for the intertubes: if I want to inform myself about climate change (or single-payer health care, military withdrawal, or open borders) I can find sites where these issues are seriously discussed, free from governmental, religious, and corporate propaganda.  Increasingly, NPR is becoming background noise, something to listen to when you need a break from the serious issues of the day.  How long will it be before Diane Rehm morphs into Larry King, <a href=\"http:\/\/lefarkins.blogspot.com\/2009\/06\/hey-is-something-going-on.html\" target=\"_blank\">more concerned about the behind-the-scenes goings on at American Chopper than the street protests in Tehran<\/a>?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>. . . to serve the corporate masters.\u00a0 Warning: NPR kvetching ahead. I thought Diane Rehm&#8217;s show started off well this morning: she interviewed presidential science advisor Dr. John Holdren about the latest White House report on climate change.\u00a0 And here&#8217;s the thing: she had him on by himself, not up against a panel of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,10,16],"tags":[43,42,41],"class_list":["post-2290","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-big-brother","category-current-events","category-media","tag-cnnfail","tag-diane-rehm","tag-npr"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2290","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2290"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2290\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2304,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2290\/revisions\/2304"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2290"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2290"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}