{"id":19700,"date":"2016-12-07T12:52:29","date_gmt":"2016-12-07T19:52:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/?p=19700"},"modified":"2016-12-08T14:41:47","modified_gmt":"2016-12-08T21:41:47","slug":"wednesday-bag-o-tweets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/?p=19700","title":{"rendered":"Wednesday Bag o&#8217; Tweets"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" src=\"https:\/\/c1.staticflickr.com\/6\/5474\/31449923016_58603c5c65_m.jpg\" alt=\"bagotweets\" width=\"240\" height=\"240\" \/>The unelected president-elect is not the only prominent politician with a Twitter account, but he&#8217;s the only one I can think of whose tweets consistently make the news.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday Trump\u00a0tweeted about a military contract with Boeing to replace the existing presidential 747s with new aircraft. Cancel the order, he said, claiming the two new planes would cost taxpayers four billion dollars.<\/p>\n<p>Boeing responded with some tweets of its own, pointing out that the aircraft weren&#8217;t going to cost anywhere near that. Others responded by pointing out that Congress is in charge of the pursestrings, and that military contracts are not subject to cancellation on a presidential\u00a0whim. A few others pointed out that Trump is not the president, and won&#8217;t be until unauguration* day, January 20, 2017.<\/p>\n<p>When I walked in the door of\u00a0Anytime Fitness this morning, the wall monitors were set to Fox News, where a reporter was justifying Trump&#8217;s tweet by claiming &#8220;everyone knows&#8221; these airplanes will cost a lot more than Boeing says they will. Fortunately the volume was turned down and the stationary bicycle was far enough away from the TVs that once I got on it I could no longer hear the\u00a0smack of media lips kissing\u00a0Trump&#8217;s behind.<\/p>\n<p>Much ado about nothing? I&#8217;ve always looked on Trump&#8217;s tweets as his way of blowing off steam, a window to a\u00a0childish, vindictive soul. Maybe he&#8217;ll follow through on his threats once he&#8217;s president, maybe not. But a lot of prominent people, in and out of the media, take\u00a0his tweets\u00a0seriously. In their eyes, if Trump says cancel the contract, Boeing can kiss that order\u00a0goodbye. Trump&#8217;s tweets are often reported on as if they&#8217;re executive orders, or at the very minimum predictions of presidential policies to come.<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes, Trump&#8217;s tweets become turning points in an ongoing cultural war:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/c4.staticflickr.com\/6\/5615\/31488504875_9ea1af734c.jpg\" alt=\"Screen Shot 2016-12-07 at 11.08.55 AM\" width=\"500\" height=\"264\" \/><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/kevin-drum\/2016\/12\/hillary-clintons-popular-vote-lead-now-2\" target=\"_blank\">As of today<\/a>, 2.6 million\u00a0more Americans voted for Hillary Clinton than for Donald Trump. Trump&#8217;s claim that anyone, let alone millions,\u00a0voted illegally is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politifact.com\/truth-o-meter\/statements\/2016\/nov\/28\/donald-trump\/donald-trumps-pants-fire-claim-millions-illegal-vo\/\" target=\"_blank\">entirely false<\/a>. But members of Trump&#8217;s transition team swear in unison he won both the electoral and popular vote. Right-wing media repeat the claim verbatim. Mainstream media uselessly straddles the fence. Republican leaders in Congress, too chicken to come right out and endorse\u00a0Trump&#8217;s lie, pretend they <a href=\"https:\/\/talkingpointsmemo.com\/livewire\/paul-ryan-trump-millions-voted-illegally\" target=\"_blank\">simply don&#8217;t know<\/a> if millions voted illegally. Trump voters, I think it&#8217;s safe to say,\u00a0believe their man no matter what he says.<\/p>\n<p>So is it true, then, that Republicans <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Reality-based_community\" target=\"_blank\">make their own reality<\/a>?\u00a0And if that&#8217;s true, then maybe Trump&#8217;s tweets really <em>ought<\/em> to be taken seriously. We can\u00a0debunk Trump&#8217;s lies and make fun of his childish vendettas\u00a0all day long, but if half of America tunes us out, if the media goes on blithely repeating Trump&#8217;s lies and taking his Twitter meltdowns seriously, if Congressional leaders shrug their shoulders and say &#8220;we just don&#8217;t know,&#8221; exactly what difference are we making? Who are we preaching to?<\/p>\n<p>We can bitch and complain on social media all day long, but our tweets are as air compared to Trump&#8217;s, and he&#8217;s gonna win that war. So what can we do? <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/2016\/11\/23\/robert-reich-how-to-resist-donald-trumps-first-100-days_partner\/\" target=\"_blank\">Robert Reich has some suggestions<\/a>\u00a0for average American citizens (remember us, the ones who voted for Hillary Clinton?), things we can do to oppose\u00a0Trump\u00a0during his first 100 days in office, the &#8220;honeymoon&#8221; period when\u00a0new presidents historically make the most impactful changes of their terms.\u00a0I&#8217;m not a big Robert Reich fan, but when he says there might be a way\u00a0to fight back effectively, I&#8217;m willing to listen.<\/p>\n<p>* When a president-elect wasn&#8217;t actually elected by the American people (who overwhelmingly voted for the other candidate), I think it&#8217;s fair to refer to him as the &#8220;unelected president-elect,&#8221; and to January 20, 2017 as &#8220;unauguration&#8221; day.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve always looked on Trump&#8217;s tweets as his way of blowing off steam, a window to a childish, vindictive soul. Maybe he&#8217;ll follow through on his threats once he&#8217;s president, maybe not. But a lot of prominent people, in and out of the media, take his tweets seriously.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,250,10,16,8,827],"tags":[1984,2203,2193,2202,2185,2024,181],"class_list":["post-19700","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-big-brother","category-culture-wars","category-current-events","category-media","category-politics","category-social-media","tag-clinton","tag-illegal-votes","tag-opposition","tag-popular-vote","tag-resistance","tag-trump","tag-twitter"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19700","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19700"}],"version-history":[{"count":15,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19700\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19716,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19700\/revisions\/19716"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19700"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19700"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19700"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}