{"id":16876,"date":"2015-07-02T11:53:25","date_gmt":"2015-07-02T18:53:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/?p=16876"},"modified":"2023-01-31T20:37:11","modified_gmt":"2023-02-01T03:37:11","slug":"burning-and-turning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/?p=16876","title":{"rendered":"Air-Minded: Burning and Turning"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The controversial and over-budget&nbsp;F-35 fighter is under almost constant attack. Some of the shortcomings identified&nbsp;by critics are no doubt real, but the story of a<a href=\"https:\/\/medium.com\/war-is-boring\/test-pilot-admits-the-f-35-can-t-dogfight-cdb9d11a875\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> previously-unidentified&nbsp;F-35 glitch<\/a> that emerged last week was, at least to this former air-to-air pilot, a bit of a shock: a report out of Edwards AFB stating that a clean (no external stores) USAF F-35A&nbsp;went dogfighting with&nbsp;a dirty (two underwing fuel tanks)&nbsp;F-16 and lost.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"f-16-en-f-35-2 copy by Paul Woodford, on Flickr\" href=\"https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/halfmind\/19381559795\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/c1.staticflickr.com\/1\/341\/19381559795_e4cc467fd9_z.jpg\" alt=\"f-16-en-f-35-2 copy\" width=\"640\" height=\"493\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Disturbing if true. Then again, the F-35 wasn&#8217;t designed as an&nbsp;air-to-air fighter; it&#8217;s a strike aircraft, a fighter-bomber, and its air-to-air role is secondary. The F-22 is supposed to clear the skies of enemy aircraft first so that strike aircraft like the F-35 can&nbsp;go in and attack enemy ground forces and installations. Who knew, back when they were designing the F-35, that the&nbsp;F-22 buy&nbsp;would be capped at less than 200&nbsp;aircraft, not the 700+ the Air Force had planned for?<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve heard that software problems limiting angle of attack&nbsp;and G onset rates might be affecting the F-35&#8217;s dogfighting performance. If so, it&#8217;s fixable, as are all the other developmental glitches and problems I&#8217;ve read&nbsp;about. And while I&#8217;m on fixability, let me say a few words about a once-controversial and over-budget aircraft I have first-hand experience with, the F-15 Eagle.<\/p>\n<p>The F-15 program was hotly contested from day one. Prior to production, factions in the Pentagon and USAF were so opposed to the F-15 they were able to successfully kickstart a lightweight fighter competition designed to derail the entire F-15 project, a program that ultimately&nbsp;led to the&nbsp;F-16 and F\/A-18.<\/p>\n<p>The F-15 survived the factional infighting and went into production, but because it&nbsp;was an airplane that pushed the technology of the day to the limit, for the first few years of its operational life&nbsp;it suffered problem after problem. Every one of these problems&nbsp;was seized upon by those opposed to the F-15&nbsp;and given maximum exposure&nbsp;in defense industry news: the engines were prone to compressor stalls, the radar and avionics didn&#8217;t work as advertised, planned defensive systems like the chaff &amp; flare dispensers weren&#8217;t ready yet, spare parts and engines to keep the jets flying weren&#8217;t in the lean budgets of the Carter years. During early air-to-air fighter evaluations conducted at Nellis AFB, F-15s lost some engagements to&nbsp;low-cost, bare-bones fighters like the F-5.<\/p>\n<p>And yet&nbsp;the F-15&#8217;s&nbsp;problems were solved; not overnight, but over the course of&nbsp;a few years. Most of the problems I mentioned were still issues when I started flying F-15s in 1978; by 1980 they had all been fixed. Engines, avionics, defensive systems, the works. As for the controversy about losing fights to cheap-o lightweight fighters like the F-5, it turned out that during those scripted encounters the F-15 pilots hadn&#8217;t been allowed to use their primary weapons, the radar-guided AIM-7 missiles that would have taken out the F-5s prior to the merge.<\/p>\n<p>The F-15 went on to become the top&nbsp;air-to-air fighter in history, a position it holds to this day. Its combat record is literally perfect:&nbsp;F-15s have shot down 104 to 106 enemy aircraft in combat&nbsp;with no losses. The F-15&nbsp;should have been retired by now, but because of the cap on F-22 production the USAF has been forced to keep a couple of hundred in service to supplement the F-22, and the F-15 is still the primary air-to-air fighter of several allied air forces.<\/p>\n<p>Reading about F-35 development problems, I&nbsp;can&#8217;t help thinking&nbsp;of the F-15 controversies of the 1970s: the factional fighting, the&nbsp;overinflated doom-saying rhetoric about&nbsp;glitches encountered&nbsp;during initial operational tests, the chest-thumping braggadocio about beating it in dogfights.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s the same old shit. It&#8217;ll be fixed.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>The Department of Homeland Security issued a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/news\/dhs-report-warns-of-right-wing-extremists\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">report on right-wing&nbsp;extremism<\/a> in 2009. It was instantly and loudly denounced&nbsp;by the right as an attack on conservatism. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.splcenter.org\/get-informed\/intelligence-report\/browse-all-issues\/2011\/summer\/inside-the-dhs-former-top-analyst-says-agency-bowed\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">DHS caved<\/a> to the AM talk radio\/Fox News noise machine, retracted the report, and shut down the working group&nbsp;that had produced it.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve always wondered what effect&nbsp;that political tempest had on&nbsp;the various agencies under DHS and the Justice Department that were&nbsp;supposed to keep an eye on domestic threats&nbsp;like the Ku Klux Klan and other white supremacist groups, the sovereign citizen&nbsp;movement, and gun nut militias. Did they&nbsp;cut back on their surveillance of&nbsp;these groups?<\/p>\n<p>I suspect there were funding and personnel cuts, but I can&#8217;t believe&nbsp;the feds quit investigating domestic threats altogether. Maybe I&#8217;m being naive. In any case,&nbsp;I fervently hope undercover FBI and ATF agents are still out there getting the dirt on rightwing extremists and domestic hate groups. We need actionable intelligence on whoever is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/news\/2015\/06\/30\/black-churches-fires-charleston-shooting\/29516267\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">torching all these black churches<\/a>, and we need it now.<\/p>\n\n\n<p><em>\u2014<a href=\"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/?page_id=14450\"><strong> back to the Air-Minded Index<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The controversial and over-budget&nbsp;F-35 fighter is under almost constant attack. Some of the shortcomings identified&nbsp;by critics are no doubt real, but the story of a previously-unidentified&nbsp;F-35 glitch that emerged last week was, at least to this former air-to-air pilot, a bit of a shock: a report out of Edwards AFB stating that a clean (no [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1960,10,189,3,64,14,22],"tags":[1907,1908,124,1909,1894],"class_list":["post-16876","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-air-minded","category-current-events","category-extremism","category-flying","category-history","category-military","category-terrorism","tag-black-churches","tag-domestic-terrorism","tag-f-15-eagle","tag-f-35-lightning-ii","tag-kkk"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16876","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16876"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16876\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32719,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16876\/revisions\/32719"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16876"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16876"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pwoodford.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16876"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}